Overview
Zionism does not have a uniform
ideology, but has evolved in a dialogue among a plethora of
ideologies: General Zionism,
Religious Zionism,
Labor Zionism,
Revisionist Zionism,
Green Zionism, etc. However, the common denominator
among all Zionists is the claim to
Eretz Israel as the national homeland of the Jews and as
the legitimate focus for the Jewish national
self-determination (as shown, among others, by Gideon
Shimoni). It is based on historical ties and
religious traditions linking the Jewish people to the
Land of Israel.
After almost two millennia of
existence of the
Jewish Diaspora without a national state, the Zionist
movement was founded in the late 19th century by
secular Jews, largely as a response by
Ashkenazi Jews to rising
anti-Semitism in
Europe, exemplified by the
Dreyfus affair in France and the
Anti-Jewish pogroms in the Russian Empire. The political
movement was formally established by the
Austro-Hungarian journalist
Theodor Herzl in 1897 following the publication of his
book
Der Judenstaat.
At that time, the movement sought to encourage
Jewish migration to the Ottoman
Palestine.
Although initially one of several
Jewish political movements offering alternative responses to
assimilation and anti-Semitism, Zionism grew rapidly and
became the dominant force in Jewish politics with the
destruction of Jewish life in Central and Eastern Europe
where these alternative movements were rooted.
The movement was eventually successful
in establishing Israel on May 14, 1948 (5 Iyyar 5708 in the
Hebrew calendar), as the
homeland for the Jewish people. The proportion of the
world's Jews living in Israel has also steadily grown since
the movement came into existence and over 40% of the
world's Jews now live in Israel, more than in any other
country. These two outcomes represent the historical success
of Zionism, unmatched by any other Jewish political movement
in the past 2,000 years.
In some academic studies, Zionism has
been analyzed both within the larger context of
Diaspora politics and as an example of modern
national liberation movements.
Zionism was also directed at
assimilation into the modern world. As a result of the
Diaspora, many of the Jewish people were outcasts and had no
knowledge of the modern era. There were Jews who desired
complete assimilation and were willing to neglect their
faith in an attempt at modernization. The assimilationists,
who are depicted as truly messianic, were a radical group in
Jewish history. They desired a pure revolution: a complete
integration of Jews into European society. This would dispel
any dissimilarity between Jews and non-Jews. They are
described as messianic in their anticipation and desire of a
new era. Assimilationists were not concerned with keeping
their own identity but wanted homogeneity. They would
disband their traditional views and opinions as long as it
insured complete assimilation into the modern world. Another
less radical form of assimilation was called cultural
synthesis. Those in favor of cultural
synthesis emphasized an obligation to maintain traditional
Jewish values but also a need to conform to a modernist
society. They are described as defensive and sought to
reject the pure revolution that the assimilationists
promoted. They aimed to eradicate any disparity between
Jewish and modern life. However (in contrast with
assimilationists), they also wanted to preserve their own
faith and many of their traditional values. They were
concerned that if Jews lost their identification, the result
would be detrimental. Those in favor of cultural synthesis
desired a balance between change and continuity as opposed
to the assimilationists who only wanted change.
In 1975, the
United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution that
designated Zionism as "a
form of racism and racial discrimination". The
resolution was repealed in 1991. Within the context of the
Arab–Israeli conflict, Zionism is viewed by critics as a
system that
fosters apartheid and racism.
Terminology
The term "Zionism" itself is derived
from the word
Zion (Hebrew:
ציון, Tzi-yon),
referring to
Jerusalem. Throughout eastern Europe at the time, there
were numerous grassroots groups promoting the national
resettlement of the Jews in what was termed their "ancestral
homeland", as well as the revitalization and cultivation of
Hebrew. These groups were collectively called the "Lovers
of Zion." The first use of the term is attributed to the
Austrian
Nathan Birnbaum, founder of a nationalist Jewish
students' movement Kadimah, who used the term in his
journal Selbstemanzipation (Self Emancipation)
.
Organization
Members and delegates at the 1939
Zionist congress, by country/region (Zionism was banned in
the Soviet Union). 70,000 Polish Jews supported the
Revisionist Zionism movement, which was not represented.
|
Country/Region |
Members |
Delegates |
|
Poland |
299,165 |
109 |
|
USA |
263,741 |
114 |
|
Palestine |
167,562 |
134 |
|
Romania |
60,013 |
28 |
|
United
Kingdom |
23,513 |
15 |
|
South Africa |
22,343 |
14 |
|
Canada |
15,220 |
8 |
The multi-national, worldwide Zionist
movement is structured on
representative democratic principles. Congresses are
held every four years (they were held every two years before
the Second World War) and delegates to the congress are
elected by the membership. Members are required to pay dues
known as a shekel. At the congress, delegates elect a
30-man executive council, which in turn elects the
movement's leader. The movement was democratic from its
inception and women had the right to vote.
Until 1917, the
World Zionist Organization pursued a strategy of
building a
Jewish National Home through persistent small-scale
immigration and the founding of such bodies as the
Jewish National Fund (1901 — a charity that bought land
for Jewish settlement) and the
Anglo-Palestine Bank (1903 — provided loans for Jewish
businesses and farmers). In 1942, at the
Biltmore Conference, the movement included for the first
time an express objective of the establishment of a Jewish
state in the Land of Israel.
The 28th
Zionist Congress, meeting in Jerusalem in 1968, adopted
the five points of the "Jerusalem Program" as the aims of
Zionism today. They are:
- Unity of the Jewish People and
the centrality of Israel in Jewish life
- Ingathering of the Jewish People
in its historic homeland, Eretz Israel, through
Aliyah from all countries
- Strengthening of the State of
Israel, based on the prophetic vision of justice and
peace
- Preservation of the identity of
the Jewish People through fostering of Jewish and Hebrew
education, and of Jewish spiritual and cultural values
- Protection of Jewish rights
everywhere
Since the creation of modern Israel,
the role of the movement has declined and it is now a
peripheral factor in
Israeli politics, though different perceptions of
Zionism continue to play a role in Israeli and Jewish
political discussion.
Labor Zionism
Main article:
Labor Zionists
Labor Zionism originated in Eastern
Europe. Socialist Zionists believed that centuries of
oppression in antisemitic societies had reduced Jews to a
meek, vulnerable, despairing existence that invited further
antisemitism, a view originally stipulated by
Theodor Herzl. They argued that a revolution of the
Jewish soul and society was necessary and achievable in part
by Jews moving to Israel and becoming farmers, workers, and
soldiers in a country of their own. Most socialist Zionists
rejected the observance of traditional religious Judaism as
perpetuating a "Diaspora mentality" among the Jewish people,
and established rural communes in Israel called "kibbutzim".
The kibbutz began as a variation on a "national farm"
scheme, a form of cooperative agriculture where the Jewish
National Fund hired Jewish workers under trained
supervision. The kibbutzim were a symbol of the Second
Aliya in that they put great emphasis on communalism and
egalitarianism, representing to a certain extent Utopian
socialism. Furthermore, they stressed self-sufficiency,
which became an important aspect of Labor Zionism. Though
socialist Zionism draws its inspiration and is
philosophically founded on the fundamental values and
spirituality of Judaism, its progressive expression of that
Judaism has often fostered an antagonistic relationship with
Orthodox Judaism.
Labor Zionism became the dominant
force in the political and economic life of the
Yishuv during the
British Mandate of Palestine and was the dominant
ideology of the political establishment in Israel until the
1977 election when the
Israeli Labor Party was defeated. The
Israeli Labor Party continues the tradition, although
the most popular party in the kibbutzim is
Meretz. Labor Zionism's main institution is the
Histadrut, which began by providing strikebreakers against a
Palestinian worker's strike in 1920 and is now the largest
employer in Israel after the Israeli government.
Liberal Zionism
General Zionism (or Liberal Zionism)
was initially the dominant trend within the Zionist movement
from the
First Zionist Congress in 1897 until after the First
World War. General Zionists identified with the liberal
European middle class to which many Zionist leaders such as
Herzl and
Chaim Weizmann aspired. Liberal Zionism, although not
associated with any single party in modern Israel, remains a
strong trend in Israeli politics advocating free market
principles, democracy and adherence to human rights.
Kadima, however, does identify with many of the
fundamental policies of Liberal Zionist ideology, advocating
among other things the need for Palestinian statehood in
order to form a more democratic society in Israel, affirming
the free market, and calling for equal rights for Arab
citizens of Israel.
Nationalist Zionism
Nationalist Zionism originated from
the Revisionist Zionists led by
Jabotinsky. The Revisionists left the World Zionist
Organization in 1935 because it refused to state that the
creation of a Jewish state was an objective of Zionism. The
revisionists advocated the formation of a Jewish Army in
Palestine to force the Arab population to accept mass Jewish
migration. Revisionist Zionism evolved into the
Likud Party in Israel, which has dominated most
governments since 1977. It advocates that Israel maintain
control of the West Bank and East Jerusalem, and takes a
hard-line approach in the Israeli-Arab conflict. In 2005 the
Likud split over the issue of creation of a Palestinian
state on the occupied territories, and party members
advocating peace talks helped form the
Kadima party.
Religious Zionism
In the 1920s and 1930s Rabbi
Abraham Isaac Kook (the first
Chief Rabbi of Palestine) and his son Rabbi Zevi Judah
Kook saw great religious and traditional value in many of
Zionism's ideals, while rejecting its anti-religious
undertones. They taught that Orthodox (Torah) Judaism
embraces and mandates Zionism's positive ideals, such as the
ingathering of exiles, and political activity to create and
maintain a Jewish political entity in the Land of Israel. In
this way, Zionism serves as a bridge between Orthodox and
secular Jews.
While other Zionist groups tended to
moderate their nationalism over time, the
gains from the
Six-Day War have led religious Zionism to play a
significant role in Israeli political life. Now associated
with the
National Religious Party and
Gush Emunim, religious Zionists have been at the
forefront of Jewish settlement in the West Bank and efforts
to assert Jewish control over the
Old City of Jerusalem.
Green Zionism
Main article:
Green Zionism
Green Zionism is a branch of Zionism primarily concerned
with the environment of Israel. The only environmental
Zionist party is the
Green Zionist Alliance.
Neo-Zionism and Post-Zionism
During the last quarter of the 20th
century, classic nationalism in Israel declined. This led to
the rise of two antagonistic movements:
neo-Zionism and
post-Zionism. Both movements mark the Israeli version of
a worldwide phenomenon:
- Emergence of globalization, a
market society and liberal culture
- Local backlash
Neo-Zionism and post-Zionism share
traits with "classical" Zionism but differ by accentuating
antagonist and diametrically opposed poles already present
in Zionism. "Neo Zionism accentuates the messianic and
particularistic dimensions of Zionist nationalism, while
post-Zionism accentuates its normalising and universalistic
dimensions". Post-Zionism asserts that Israel should abandon
the concept of a "state of the Jewish people" and strive to
be a state of all its citizens,
or a
binational state where Arabs and Jews live together
while enjoying some type of autonomy.
Zionism and Haredi Judaism
Most Haredi Orthodox organizations do
not belong to the Zionist movement; they view Zionism as
secular, reject nationalism as a doctrine and consider
Judaism to be first and foremost a religion. However, some
Haredi movements such as
Shas do openly affiliate with the Zionist movement.
Haredi rabbis do not consider Israel
to be a
halachic Jewish state because it is secular. However,
they generally consider themselves responsible for ensuring
that Jews maintain religious ideals and since most Israeli
citizens are Jews they pursue this agenda within Israel.
Others reject any possibility of a Jewish state, since
according to them a Jewish state is completely forbidden by
Jewish law, and a Jewish state is considered an oxymoron.
Two Haredi parties run in Israeli
elections. They are sometimes associated with views that
could be regarded as nationalist or Zionist, and have shown
a preference for coalitions with more nationalist Zionist
parties, probably because these are more interested in
enhancing the Jewish nature of the Israeli state.
The Sephardi-Orthodox party
Shas rejected association with the Zionist movement,
however in 2010 it joined the
World Zionist Organization, its voters also generally
regard themselves as Zionist and Knesset members frequently
pursue what others might consider a Zionist agenda. Shas has
supported territorial compromise with the Arabs and
Palestinians but generally opposes compromise over Jewish
holy sites.
The non-Hasidic or 'Lithuanian' Haredi
Ashkenazi world is represented by the Ashkenazi
Agudat Israel/UTJ
party has always avoided association with the Zionist
movement and usually avoids voting on or discussing issues
related to peace because its members do not serve in the
army. The party does work towards ensuring that Israel and
Israeli law are in tune with the
halacha, on issues such as
Shabbat rest. The rabbinical leaders of the so-called
Litvishe world in current and past generations, such as
Rabbi
Elazar Menachem Shach and Rabbi
Avigdor Miller, are strongly opposed to all forms of
Zionism, religious and secular, but allow for slight
cooperation in the form of participating in Israeli
political life, including both passive and active
participation in elections.
Many other
Hasidic groups, most famously the
Satmar Hasidim as well as the larger movement they are
part of in Jerusalem, the
Edah HaChareidis, are strongly anti-Zionist. One of the
best known Hasidic opponent of all forms of modern political
Zionism was
Hungarian
rebbe and
Talmudic scholar
Joel Teitelbaum. In his view, the current
State of Israel, which was
founded by people that included some anti-religious
personalities in seeming violation of the traditional notion
that Jews should wait for the Jewish Messiah, is seen as
contrary to Judaism. The core citations from classical
Judaic sources cited by Teitelbaum in his arguments against
modern Zionism are based on a passage in the Talmud, Rabbi
Yosi b'Rebbi Hanina explains (Kesubos 111a) that the Lord
imposed "Three
Oaths" on the nation of Israel: a) Israel should not
return to the Land together, by force; b) Israel should not
rebel against the other nations; and c) The nations should
not subjugate Israel too harshly. According to Teitelbaum,
the second oath is relevant concerning the subsequent wars
fought between Israel and Arab nations.
Other opponent groups included in the
Edah HaChareidis include
Dushinsky,
Toldos Aharon,
Toldos Avrohom Yitzchok,
Spinka, and others, numbering tens of thousands in
Jerusalem, and hundreds of thousands worldwide.
The
Neturei Karta, an orthodox Haredi religious movement,
strongly oppose Zionism and Israel; it considers the latter
a racist regime. The
movement equates Zionism to
Nazism, stating "Apart from the Zionists, the only ones
who consistently considered the Jews a race were the Nazis."
Naturei Carta believes that Zionist ideology
is totally contrary to traditional
Jewish law and beliefs and the teachings of the
Holy Torah and that Zionism promotes
antisemitism.
The
Chabad-Lubavitch Hasidic movement has traditionally not
identified itself as Zionist, although in recent years it
has adopted a nationalist agenda and opposed any territorial
compromise.
Particularities of Zionist
beliefs
Zionism was established with the goal
of creating a Jewish state. Though later Zionist leaders
hoped to create a Jewish state in Eretz Yisrael, Theodor
Herzl "approached Great Britain about possible Jewish
settlement in that country's East African colonies."
Aliyah (migration, literally "ascent") to the Land of
Israel is a recurring theme in Jewish prayers. Some Zionists
consider Jews outside of Israel as living in exile.
Rejection of life in the Diaspora is a central
assumption in Zionism. Underlying this attitude is the
feeling that the Diaspora restricts the full growth of
Jewish individual and national life.
Zionists generally preferred to speak
Hebrew, a
Semitic language that developed under conditions of
freedom in ancient
Judah, modernizing and adapting it for everyday use.
Zionists sometimes refused to speak
Yiddish, a language they considered affected by
Christian persecution. Once they moved to Israel, many
Zionists refused to speak their (diasporic) mother tongues
and gave themselves new, Hebrew names. Hebrew was preferred
not only for ideological reasons, but also because it
allowed members of the new Yishuv who came from different
parts of the world to have a common language, thus
furthering the political and cultural bonds between
Zionists.
Major aspects of the Zionist idea are
represented in the
Israeli Declaration of Independence:
The Land of Israel was the
birthplace of the Jewish people. Here their
spiritual, religious and political identity was
shaped. Here they first attained to statehood,
created cultural values of national and universal
significance and gave to the world the eternal Book
of Books.After being
forcibly exiled from their land, the people kept
faith with it throughout their Dispersion and never
ceased to pray and hope for their return to it and
for the restoration in it of their political
freedom.
Impelled by this historic and
traditional attachment, Jews strove in every
successive generation to re-establish themselves in
their ancient homeland. In recent decades they
returned in their masses.
Zionism is dedicated to fighting
antisemitism. Some Zionists believe antisemitism will never
disappear (and that Jews must conduct themselves with this
in mind), while
others perceive Zionism as a vehicle with which to end
antisemitism.
History
Population of Palestine by
ethno-religious groups
| year |
Muslims |
Jews |
Christians |
Others |
Total |
| 1922 |
486,177 (74.91%) |
83,790 (12.91%) |
71,464 (11.01%) |
7,617 (1.17%) |
649,048 |
| 1931 |
493,147 (64.32%) |
174,606 (22.77%) |
88,907 (11.60%) |
10,101 (1.32%) |
766,761 |
| 1941 |
906,551 (59.68%) |
474,102 (31.21%) |
125,413 (8.26%) |
12,881 (0.85%) |
1,518,947 |
| 1946 |
1,076,783 (58.34%) |
608,225 (32.96%) |
145,063 (7.86%) |
15,488 (0.84%) |
1,845,559 |
| 1950 |
116,100 |
1,203,000 |
|
|
|
Since the first centuries CE most Jews
have lived outside
Land of Israel (Eretz Israel, better known as
Palestine by non-Jews), although there has been a
constant presence of Jews. According to Judaism,
Eretz Israel is a land promised to the Jews by God
according to the Bible. The Diaspora began in 586 BCE during
the Babylonian occupation of Israel. The Babylonians
destroyed the First Temple, which was central to Jewish
culture at the time. After the 1st century
Great Revolt and the 2nd century
Bar Kokhba revolt, the
Romans expelled the Jews from
Judea, changing the name to Syria Palaestina. The
Bar Kokhba revolt caused a spike in anti-Semitism and Jewish
persecution. The ensuing exile from Judea greatly increased
the percent of Jews who were dispersed throughout the
Diaspora instead of living in their original home.
Zion is a hill near Jerusalem (now in the city), widely
symbolizing the Land of Israel.
In the middle of the sixteenth century
Joseph Nasi, with the support of the
Ottoman Empire, tried to gather the Portuguese Jews,
first to
Cyprus, then owned by the Republic of Venice and later
to Tiberias. This was the only practical attempt to
establish some sort of Jewish political center in Palestine
between the fourth and 19th centuries. In the seventeenth
century
Sabbatai Zebi (1626–1676) announced himself as the
Messias and gained over many Jews to his side, forming a
base in Salonica. He first tried to establish a settlement
in Gaza, but moved later to Smyrna. After deposing the old
rabbi
Aaron Lapapa even the Jewish community of
Avignon prepared to emigrate to the new kingdom in the
spring of 1666. The readiness of the Jews of the time to
believe the messianic claims of Sabbatai Zevi may be largely
explained by the desperate state of European Jewry in the
mid-17th century. The bloody pogroms of
Bohdan Khmelnytsky had wiped out one third of the Jewish
population and destroyed many centers of Jewish learning and
communal life. Finally, he was forced by the Ottoman Sultan
Mehmed IV to visit him and, to the surprise of his
followers, in the presence of the Sultan he converted to
Islam.
In the 19th century, a current in
Judaism supporting a
return to Zion grew in popularity, particularly in
Europe, where antisemitism and hostility towards Jews were
also growing, although this idea was rejected by the
conferences of rabbis held in that epoch. Nonetheless,
individual efforts supported the emigration of groups of
Jews to Palestine,
pre-Zionist Aliyah, even before 1897, the year
considered as the start of practical Zionism.
The Reformed Jews rejected this idea
of a return to Zion. The conference of rabbis, at
Frankfurt am Main, July 15–28, 1845, deleted from the
ritual all prayers for a return to Zion and a restoration of
a Jewish state. The Philadelphia conference, 1869, followed
the lead of the German rabbis and decreed that the Messianic
hope of Israel is "the union of all the children of God in
the confession of the unity of God". The Pittsburg
conference, 1885, reiterated this Messianic idea of reformed
Judaism, expressing in a resolution that "we consider
ourselves no longer a nation, but a religious community; and
we therefore expect neither a return to Palestine, nor a
sacrificial worship under the sons of Aaron, nor the
restoration of any of the laws concerning a Jewish state".
Jewish settlements were established in
the upper Mississippi region by W.D. Robinson in 1819 and
near Jerusalem, by the American Consul
Warder Cresson, a convert to Judaism, in 1850. Before he
succeeded, he was tried and condemned for lunacy in a suit
brought forward by his own wife and son; after winning a
second trial he established a colony in the
Valley of Rephaim, where he hoped to "prevent any
attempts being made to take advantage of the necessities of
our poor brethren ... (that would) ... FORCE them into a
pretended conversion."[38]
Similar efforts were made in Prague, by
Abraham Benisch and
Moritz Steinschneider in 1835.
Sir
Moses Montefiore, famous for his intervention in favor
of Jews around the world, including the attempt to rescue
Edgardo Mortara, established a colony for Jews in
Palestine. In 1854, his friend
Judah Touro bequeathed money to fund Jewish residential
settlement in Palestine. Montefiore was appointed executor
of his will, and used the funds for a variety of projects,
including building in 1860 the first Jewish residential
settlement and almshouse outside of the old walled city of
Jerusalem — today known as
Mishkenot Sha'ananim.
Laurence Oliphant failed in a like attempt to bring to
Palestine the Jewish proletariat of Poland, Lithuania,
Romania, and the Turkish Empire (1879 and 1882). The
official beginning of the construction of the
New Yishuv in Palestine is usually dated back to the
arrival of the
Bilu group in 1882, which commenced the
First Aliyah. In the following years, Jewish immigration
to Palestine started in earnest. Most
immigrants came from Russia, escaping the frequent
pogroms and state-led persecution. They founded a number
of agricultural settlements with financial support from
Jewish philanthropists in Western Europe. Further Aliyahs
followed the
Russian Revolution and
Nazi persecution. However, at the end of the XIX
century, Jews still were a minority in Palestina.
In the 1890s,
Theodor Herzl infused Zionism with a new
ideology and practical urgency, leading to the
First Zionist Congress at
Basel in 1897, which created the
World Zionist Organization (WZO). Herzl's
aim was to initiate necessary preparatory steps for the
attainment of a Jewish state. Herzl's attempts to reach a
political agreement with the
Ottoman rulers of Palestine were unsuccessful and other
governmental support was sought. The WZO supported
small-scale settlement in Palestine and focused on
strengthening Jewish feeling and consciousness and on
building a worldwide federation.
The Russian Empire, with its long
record of state organized genocide and ethnic cleansing
("pogroms") was widely regarded as the historic enemy of the
Jewish people. As much of its leadership were German
speakers, the Zionist movement's headquarters were located
in Berlin. At the start of World War I, most Jews (and
Zionists) supported Germany in its war with Russia.
Lobbying by a Russian Jewish
immigrant,
Chaim Weizmann and fear that
American Jews would encourage the USA to support Germany
culminated in the
Balfour Declaration of 1917 by the British government
(the Zionist congress had decided already by 1903 to decline
an offer by the British to establish a homeland in Uganda).
This endorsed the creation of a Jewish Homeland in
Palestine. In addition, a Zionist military corps led by
Jabotinsky were recruited to fight on behalf of Britain
in Palestine.
In 1922, the
League of Nations adopted the declaration in the
Mandate it gave to Britain:
The Mandatory (…) will secure the
establishment of the Jewish national home, as laid
down in the preamble, and the development of
self-governing institutions, and also for
safeguarding the civil and religious rights of all
the inhabitants of Palestine, irrespective of race
and religion.
Weizmann's role in obtaining the
Balfour Declaration led to his election as the movement's
leader. He remained in that role until 1948 and then became
the first
President of Israel.
Jewish migration to Palestine and
widespread Jewish land purchases from feudal landlords led
to landlessness and fueled unrest — often led by the same
landlords who sold the land. There were riots in 1920, 1921
and 1929, sometimes accompanied by massacres of Jews The
victims were usually from the non-Zionist Haredi Jewish
communities in the
Four Holy Cities. Britain supported Jewish immigration
in principle, but in reaction to Arab violence imposed
restrictions.
In 1933,
Hitler came to power in Germany, and in 1935 the
Nuremberg Laws made German Jews (and later
Austrian and
Czech Jews) stateless refugees. Similar rules were
applied by the many
Nazi allies in Europe. The subsequent growth in Jewish
migration and impact of
Nazi propaganda aimed at the Arab world led to the
1936–1939 Arab revolt in Palestine. Britain established
the
Peel Commission to investigate the situation. The
commission did not consider the situation of Jews in Europe,
but called for a two-state solution and compulsory
transfer of populations. Britain rejected this solution
and instead implemented
White Paper of 1939. This planned to end Jewish
immigration by 1944 and to allow no more than 75,000 further
Jewish migrants. This was disastrous to European Jews
already being gravely discriminated against and in need of a
place to seek refuge. The British maintained this policy
until the end of the Mandate.
Growth of the Jewish community in
Palestine and devastation of European Jewish life sidelined
the World Zionist Organization. The Jewish Agency for
Palestine under the leadership of
David Ben-Gurion increasingly dictated policy with
support from American Zionists who provided funding and
influence in Washington, D.C., including via the highly
effective
American Palestine Committee.
After World War II and
the Holocaust, a massive wave of
stateless Jews, mainly
Holocaust survivors, began
migrating to Palestine in small boats in defiance of
British rules. The Holocaust united much of the rest of
world Jewry behind the Zionist project. The British either
imprisoned these Jews in Cyprus (including many orphaned
children) or
sent them to the British-controlled
Allied Occupation Zones in Germany. This resulted in
universal Jewish support for Zionism and the refusal of the
U.S. Congress to grant economic aid to Britain. In addition,
Zionist groups
attacked the British in Palestine and, with its empire
facing bankruptcy, Britain was forced to refer the issue to
the newly created United Nations.
In 1947, the
United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP)
recommended that western Palestine should be partitioned
into a Jewish state, an Arab state and a
UN-controlled territory, Corpus separatum, around
Jerusalem. This
partition plan was adopted on November 29, 1947 with
UN GA Resolution 181, 33 votes in favor, 13 against, and
10 abstentions. The vote led to celebrations in the streets
of Jewish cities. However, the Palestinian Arabs and the
Arab states rejected the UN decision, demanding a single
state and removal of Jewish migrants, leading to the
1948 Arab–Israeli War.
On May 14, 1948, at the end of the
British mandate, the Jewish Agency, led by
David Ben-Gurion, declared the creation of the State of
Israel, and the same day the armies of seven
Arab countries invaded Israel. The conflict led to an
exodus of about
711,000 Arab Palestinians, known to Palestinians as
Al Nakba (the "catastrophe"), and the
exodus of 850,000 Jews from the Arab world, mostly to
Israel. Later,
a series of laws passed by the first Israeli government
prevented Palestinians from returning to their homes, or
claiming their property. They and many of their descendants
remain
refugees. The expulsion of the Palestinians has since
been widely, and controversially, described as having
involved "ethnic
cleansing".
Since the creation of the State of
Israel, the
World Zionist Organization has functioned mainly as an
organization dedicated to assisting and encouraging Jews to
migrate to Israel. It has provided political support for
Israel in other countries but plays little role in internal
Israeli politics. The movement's major success since 1948
was in providing logistical support for migrating Jews and,
most importantly, in assisting
Soviet Jews in their struggle with the authorities over
the right to leave the
USSR and to practice their religion in freedom.
Non-Jewish support for Zionism
Political support for the Jewish
return to the Land of Israel predates the formal
organization of Jewish Zionism as a political movement. In
the 19th century, advocates of the
Restoration of the Jews to the Holy Land were called
Restorationists. The return of the Jews to the Holy Land was
widely supported by such eminent figures as
Queen Victoria,
Napoleon Bonaparte,[50]
King Edward VII, President
John Adams of the United States,
General Smuts of South Africa,
President Masaryk of
Czechoslovakia, philosopher and historian
Benedetto Croce from Italy,
Henry Dunant (founder of the
Red Cross and author of the
Geneva Conventions), and scientist and humanitarian
Fridtjof Nansen from
Norway.
The French government through Minister
M. Cambon formally committed itself to "... the renaissance
of the Jewish nationality in that Land from which the people
of Israel were exiled so many centuries ago."
In China, top figures of the
Nationalist government, including
Sun Yat-sen, expressed their sympathy with the
aspirations of the Jewish people for a National Home.
Christians supporting Zionism
Some Christians have actively
supported the return of Jews to Palestine even prior to
Zionism, as well as subsequently. One of the principal
Protestant teachers who promoted the biblical doctrine that
the Jews would return to their national homeland was
John Nelson Darby. He is credited with being the major
promoter of the idea following his 11 lectures on the hopes
of the church, the Jew and the gentile given in Geneva in
1840. His views were embraced by many evangelicals and also
affected international foreign policy. Notable early
supporters of Zionism include British Prime Ministers
David Lloyd George and
Arthur Balfour, American President
Woodrow Wilson and British
Major-General
Orde Wingate, whose activities in support of Zionism led
the British Army to ban him from ever serving in Palestine.
According to Charles Merkley of Carleton University,
Christian Zionism strengthened significantly after the
Six-Day War of 1967, and many
dispensationalist Christians, especially in the United
States, now strongly support Zionism.
The founder of
Latter Day Saint movement,
Joseph Smith, Jr., in his last years alive, declared
"the time for Jews to return to the land of Israel is now."
In 1842, Smith sent
Orson Hyde, an Apostle of the
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, to
Jerusalem to dedicate the land for the return of the Jews.[52]
Some
Arab Christians publicly supporting Israel include US
author
Nonie Darwish, and former Muslim
Magdi Allam, author of Viva Israele,[53]
both born in Egypt.
Brigitte Gabriel, a Lebanese-born Christian US
journalist and founder of the
American Congress for Truth, urges Americans to
"fearlessly speak out in defense of America, Israel and
Western civilization".
Muslims supporting Zionism
Main article:
Muslim Zionism
In 1873,
Shah of Persia
Naser al-Din Shah Qajar met with British Jewish leaders,
including Sir
Moses Montefiore, during his journey to Europe. At that
time, the Persian king suggested that the Jews buy land and
establish a state for the Jewish people.]
Muslims who publicly defended Zionism
include Dr.
Tawfik Hamid, former member of a terror organization and
current Islamic thinker and reformer, Sheikh Prof.
Abdul Hadi Palazzi, Director of the Cultural Institute
of the Italian Islamic Community, and
Tashbih Sayyed, a Pakistani-American scholar,
journalist, and author.
On occasion, some non-Arab Muslims
such as some
Kurds and
Berbers have also voiced support for Zionism.
During the Palestine Mandate era,
As'ad Shukeiri, a Muslim scholar ('alim) of the Acre
area, and the father of
PLO founder
Ahmad Shukeiri, rejected the values of the Palestinian
Arab national movement and was opposed to the
anti-Zionist movement. He met routinely with
Zionist officials and had a part in every pro-Zionist
Arab organization from the beginning of the
British Mandate, publicly rejecting
Mohammad Amin al-Husayni's use of Islam to attack
Zionism.
Some Indian Muslims have also
expressed opposition to
Islamic anti-Zionism. In August 2007, a delegation of
the All India Organization of
Imams and mosques led by
Maulana Jamil Ilyas visited Israel. The meet led to a
joint statement expressing "peace and goodwill from Indian
Muslims", developing dialogue between Indian Muslims and
Israeli Jews, and rejecting the perception that the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict is of a religious nature.[64]
The visit was organized by the
American Jewish Committee. The purpose of the visit was
to create meaningful debate about the status of Israel in
the Muslim eyes worldwide, and strengthen the relationship
between India and Israel. It is suggested that the visit
could "open Muslim minds across the world to understand the
democratic nature of the state of Israel, especially in the
Middle East".
Hindu support for Zionism
After Israel's creation in 1948, the
Indian National Congress government opposed Zionism.
Some writers have claimed that this was in order to get more
Muslim votes in India (where Muslims numbered over 30
million at the time). However, conservative Hindu
nationalists, led by the
Sangh Parivar, openly supported Zionism, as did Hindu
Nationalist intellectuals like
Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and
Sita Ram Goel. Zionism as a national liberation movement
to repatriate the Jewish people to their ancestral homeland
appealed to many
Hindu Nationalists, who viewed their struggle for
independence from British rule and the
Partition of India as national liberation for
long-oppressed Hindus.
An international opinion survey has
shown that India is the most pro-Israel country in the
world. In more current times, conservative Indian parties
and organizations tend to support Zionism. This has invited
attacks on the
Hindutva movement by parts of the Indian left opposed to
Zionism, and allegations that Hindus are conspiring with the
"Jewish
Lobby."
Marcus Garvey and Black Zionism
Zionist success in winning British
support for formation of a Jewish National Home in Palestine
helped to inspire the Jamaican nationalist
Marcus Garvey to form a movement dedicated to returning
Americans of African origin to Africa. During a speech in
Harlem in 1920, Garvey stated: "other races were engaged
in seeing their cause through — the Jews through their
Zionist movement and the Irish through their Irish movement
— and I decided that, cost what it might, I would make this
a favorable time to see the Negro's interest through."
Garvey established a shipping company, the
Black Star Line, to allow Black Americans to emigrate to
Africa, but for various reasons failed in his endeavour.
Garvey helped inspire the
Rastafari movement in Jamaica, the
Black Jews and the
African Hebrew Israelites of Jerusalem who initially
moved to Liberia before settling in Israel.
Opposition to Zionism
Zionism is opposed by a wide variety
of organizations and individuals. Among those opposing
Zionism are some secular Jews, some branches of Judaism (Satmar
Hasidim and
Neturei Karta), the former Soviet Union, some
African-Americans, many in the Muslim world, and
Palestinians. Reasons for opposing Zionism are varied, and
include the perceptions of unfair land confiscation,
expulsions of Palestinians, violence against Palestinians,
and alleged racism. Arab states in particular strongly
oppose Zionism, which they believe is responsible for the
1948 Palestinian exodus.
Zionism had also been opposed by some
Jews for other reasons even before the establishment of the
state of Israel because "Zionism constitutes a danger,
spiritual and physical, to the existence of our
people.'.".The book also states "The booklet which we are
publishing here, 'Serufay. Ha Kivshbnim Maashimim' ('The
Holocaust Victims Accuse'), serves as an attempt to show, by
means of testimonies., documents and reports, how Zionism
and its high-level organizations brought a catastrophe upon
our people during the era of the Nazi holocaust."
Catholic Church and Zionism
The initial response of the Catholic
Church seemed to be one of strong opposition to Zionism.
Shortly after the 1897 Basle Conference, the semi-official
Vatican periodical (edited by the Jesuits)
Civilta Cattolica gave its biblical-theological
judgement on political Zionism: "1827 years have passed
since the prediction of Jesus of Nazareth was fulfilled ...
that [after the destruction of Jerusalem] the Jews would be
led away to be slaves among all the nations and that they
would remain in the dispersion [diaspora, galut] until the
end of the world." The Jews should not be permitted to
return to Palestine with sovereignty: "According to the
Sacred Scriptures, the Jewish people must always live
dispersed and vagabondo [vagrant, wandering] among the other
nations, so that they may render witness to Christ not only
by the Scriptures ... but by their very existence".
Nonetheless, Theodore Herzl travelled
to Rome in late January 1904, after the sixth Zionist
Congress (August, 1903) and six months before his death,
looking for some kind of support. In January 22, Herzl first
met the Secretary of State, Cardinal
Rafael Merry del Val. According to Herzl's private diary
notes, the Cardinal agreed on the history of Israel being
the same as the one of the Catholic Church, but asked
beforehand for a conversion of Jews to Catholicism. Three
days later, Herzl met Pope
Pius X, who replied to his request of support for a
Jewish return to Israel in the same terms, saying that "we
are unable to favor this movement. We cannot prevent the
Jews going to Jerusalem, but we could never sanction it ...
The Jews have not recognized our Lord, therefore we cannot
recognize the Jewish people." In 1922 the same recourse of
preordained divine judgment in the Bible was utilized by the
same periodical to oppose Zionism, alleging that the
rejection and
killing of Jesus by the Jews condemned them in the eyes
of Catholics. This initial attitude changed over the next 50
years, until 1997, when at the
Vatican symposium of that year, Pope
John Paul II rejected the Christian roots of
anti-Semitism, expressing that "... the wrong and unjust
interpretations of the New Testament relating to the Jewish
people and their supposed guilt [in Christ's death]
circulated for too long, engendering sentiments of hostility
toward this people."
Characterization as colonialism
Zionism has been characterized as
colonialism, and Zionism has been
criticized for promoting unfair confiscation of land,
involving expulsion of indigenous peoples, and causing
violence towards Palestinians. The characterization of
Zionism as colonialism has been described by, among others,
Nur Masalha, Gershon Shafir,
Michael Prior,
Ilan Pappe, and
Baruch Kimmerling.
Others, such as
Shlomo Avineri and
Mitchell Bard, view Zionism not as colonialist movement,
but as a national movement that is contending with the
Palestinian one.
David Hoffman rejected the claim that Zionism is a
'settler-colonial undertaking' and instead characterized
Zionism as a national program of
affirmative action, adding that there is unbroken Jewish
presence in Israel back to antiquity.
Noam Chomsky, John P. Quigly,
Nur Masalha, and
Cheryl Rubenberg have criticized Zionism, saying it
unfairly confiscates land and expels Palestinians.
Edward Said and
Michael Prior claim that the notion of expelling the
indigenous population was an early component of Zionism,
citing Herzl's diary from 1895 which states "we shall
endeavour to expel the poor population across the border
unnoticed — the process of expropriation and the removal of
the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly."
Derek Penslar says that Herzl may have been considering
either South America or Palestine when he wrote the diary
entry about expropriation.
Ilan Pappe argued that Zionism results in
ethnic cleansing. This view diverges from other
New Historians, such as
Benny Morris, who accept the
Palestinian exodus narrative but place it in the context
of war, not ethnic cleansing.
Saleh Abdel Jawad,
Nur Masalha,
Michael Prior,
Ian Lustick, and
John Rose have criticised Zionism for having been
responsible for violence against Palestinians, such as the
Deir Yassin massacre,
Sabra and Shatila massacre, and
Cave of the Patriarchs massacre.
In 1938,
Mahatma Gandhi rejected Zionism, saying that the
establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine is a
religious act and therefore must not be performed by force.
He wrote, "Palestine belongs to the Arabs in the same sense
that England belongs to the English or France to the French.
It is wrong and inhuman to impose the Jews on the Arabs ...
Surely it would be a crime against humanity to reduce the
proud Arabs so that Palestine can be restored to the Jews
partly or wholly as their national home ... They can settle
in Palestine only by the goodwill of the Arabs. They should
seek to convert the Arab heart."
Characterization as racist
Critics of Zionism consider it a
colonialist or
racist movement. Some scholars consider certain forms of
opposition to Zionism to constitute Antisemitism.
Some critics of Zionism describe it as
racist or discriminatory. Some criticisms of Zionism
specifically identify Judaism's notion of the "chosen
people" as the source of racism in Zionism, despite that
being a religious concept unrelated to Zionism.
In December 1973, the UN passed a
series of resolutions condemning South Africa and included a
reference to an "unholy alliance between
Portuguese colonialism,
Apartheid and Zionism." At the time there was little
cooperation between
Israel and South Africa, although the two countries
would develop a close relationship during the 1970s.
Parallels have also been drawn between aspects of South
Africa's apartheid regime and certain Israeli policies
toward the Palestinians, which are seen as manifestations of
racism in Zionist thinking.
In 1975 the
UN General Assembly passed
Resolution 3379, which said "Zionism is a form of racism
and racial discrimination". According to the resolution,
"any doctrine of racial differentiation of superiority is
scientifically false, morally condemnable, socially unjust,
and dangerous." The resolution named the occupied territory
of Palestine, Zimbabwe, and South Africa as examples of
racist regimes. Resolution 3379 was pioneered by the Soviet
Union and passed with numerical support from Arab and
African states amidst accusations that Israel was supportive
of the apartheid regime in South Africa. In 1991 the
resolution was repealed with
UN General Assembly Resolution 46/86,
after Israel declared that it would only
participate in the
Madrid Conference of 1991 if the resolution were
revoked.
Arab countries sought to associate
Zionism with racism in connection with a
2001 UN conference on racism, which took place in
Durban, South Africa, which caused the United States and
Israel to walk away from the conference as a response. The
final text of the conference did not connect Zionism with
racism. A human rights forum arranged in connection with the
conference, on the other hand, did equate Zionism with
racism and censured Israel for what it called "racist
crimes, including acts of genocide and ethnic cleansing".
The
African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights was adopted
in 1981 by the
Organisation of African Unity, which has since evolved
into the
African Union. The preamble of the charter includes a
call to "eliminate colonialism, neo-colonialism, apartheid,
zionism and to dismantle aggressive foreign military bases
and all forms of discrimination, particularly those based on
race, ethnic group, color, sex. language, religion or
political opinions". The charter has been ratified by 53
African countries.
Some supporters of Zionism, such as
Chaim Herzog, argue that the movement is
non-discriminatory and contains no racist aspects.
Anti-Zionism as anti-Semitism
It is argued by some scholars that the
opposition to Zionism at the more extreme fringes may be
hard to separate from
antisemitism.
Anti-semites have alleged that Zionism
was, or is, part of a Jewish plot to take control of the
world. One particular version of these allegations, "The
Protocols of the Elders of Zion" (subtitle "Protocols
extracted from the secret archives of the central chancery
of Zion") achieved global notability. The protocols are
fictional minutes of an imaginary meeting by Jewish leaders
of this plot. Analysis and proof of their fraudulent origin
goes as far back as 1921. A 1920 German version renamed them
"The
Zionist Protocols". The protocols were
extensively used as propaganda by the
Nazis and remain widely
distributed in the Arab world. They are referred to in
the 1988
Hamas charter.
There are examples of anti-Zionists
using accusations, slanders, imagery and tactics previously
associated with anti-semites. On October 21, 1973,
then-Soviet ambassador to the United Nations
Yakov Malik declared: "The Zionists have come forth with
the theory of the
Chosen People, an absurd ideology." Similarly, an
exhibit about Zionism and Israel in the Museum of Religion
and Atheism in
Saint Petersburg designates the following as Soviet
Zionist material: Jewish
prayer shawls,
tefillin and
Passover
Hagaddahs, even though these are all religious
items used by Jews for thousands of years.
Noam Chomsky,
Norman Finkelstein, Irfan Khawaja, and
Tariq Ali have suggested that the characterization of
anti-Zionism as
anti-Semitic is inaccurate, sometimes obscures
legitimate
criticism of Israel's policies and actions, and is
sometimes a political ploy to stifle
criticism of Israel.
Types of Zionism
Zionist institutions and
organizations
History of Zionism and Israel
Miscellanea